by Andrew Chen
November 4, 2021
Canada and at least 24 other countries have committed at the COP26 climate summit to end all public financing for fossil fuel projects abroad by the end of 2022, despite the absence of major Asian countries that contribute to a bulk of such financing.
The decision came Nov. 4 at the United Nations climate change conference, where the 25 countries signed a pledge to prioritize support for a “clean energy transition.”
The signatories include Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, Denmark, Italy, Finland, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, and New Zealand. Five development institutions also added their signatures, including the European Investment Bank and the East African Development Bank.
“We will end new direct public support for the international unabated fossil fuels energy sector by the end of 2022,” said a joint statement from the signatory countries.
Read More HERE
Have they got the commitment from the worst offenders on the entire planet? That would be Communist CHINA. The answer to that would be NO. They use more than the rest of the entire world. So, it is very obvious that they have no intension being that they are planning to take of the entire world, and they will be the only ones that matter. Everyone must bow to their demand and but they themselves DO NOT have to comply.
Wake up world you are just a bunch of Lemmings following the leader off of a cliff.
Support oil and gas
BELOW IS A WRITE UP I DID BACK IN 2019, THE INFO USED CAME FROM A PROFESSOR’S STUDY OUT OF DENVER UNIVERSITY IN COLORADO!
After you read this ask yourselves how it will be possible to achieve the carbon neutral folly by 2050? The answer is, IT WON’T BE POSSIBLE! Only growingly retarded, virtue signalling nations like Canada, USA much of Europe and such will self harm over an ideology (anthropogenic climate change) that is fraught with GREED, LIES, ERRORS and INNUENDO! Trust me other non virtue signalling nations like China, India, Russia and others WILL NOT attempt to self harm or attempt economic, social and political suicide. WE IN THE GREAT WESTERN WORLD BETTER WAKE THE HELL UP AMD STOP THIS NONSENSE AND LIES!
———————————————————————————————————————-
There are less than 11,000 days until Jan. 2050. This is the year that anthropogenic climate changers claim the world must be carbon neutral. Let’s examine some things that they will not tell you and/or refuse to accept as reality.
In 2018 the global consumption of fossil fuels energy was 11,865million metric tons of oil equivalent energy. BTW do you think it will stay at this amount or not go up higher as the years pass by?
In order to be carbon neutral by Jan. 2050 the following are the range of non-fossil fuel alternatives needed to be implemented.
One 1.5 gigawatt nuclear power plant must be built each day between now and 2050. Does anyone see that as plausible?
No nuclear power generation! OK, lets look at solar. It takes 3 million solar panels under optimum solar conditions to generate 1 gigawatt of electricity. We will have to manufacture and install 3 million solar panel each day (that is about <11,000 days) between now and 2050. Solar panels use toxic elements in their manufacture and need lots of energy to make as well. Does anyone see that as plausible?
Wind generation? It will take the manufacturing and installation of 430 commercial wind turbines each day x 11,000 days between now and 2050. Typically a commercial wind turbine uses about 700 tons of concrete ( plus steel rebar) as a base to securely erect it. Each 150 ft. long blade requires 60,000 lbs. of epoxy and 100,000 lbs. of fibreglass, all of it energy hogs to make. Does anyone see this as plausible?
The figures above will need to essentially be doubled though as we will have to mine materials (lots of rare earth) and manufacture huge battery back ups for night and adverse weather needs thus doubling the above number for half will be needed for day time power generation and the other half to recharge these batteries after each night. Does anyone see this at all possible?
CO2 has never been shown to be raising global temps anyways. No facts will support this. Historic measures, using ice core samples, show growing CO2 in the atmosphere as a trailer in any 'natural' climate change and not a driver of such. Anthropogenic climate change is all conjecture and hypothesis. The warmest decade on Earth over the last 100 years was the 1930’s and CO2 levels were below 300ppm, not the 400ppm they are today. In fact ice core samples tell us that over the many millions of years earth's CO2 rates averaged between 1000-1500 ppm, ALL WELL BEFORE MAN MADE INDUSTRIALIZATION!
The environment is a negative feedback loop constantly self correcting as it has for near 5 billion years. God created the Earth to in perpetuity self sustain itself, and mankind does not have the ability to alter this negatively.