Breitbart News Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon unleashed a stream of indignation at failed presidential candidate Mitt Romney after Romney impugned West Point-grad and Vietnam veteran Roy Moore’s “honor and integrity” Tuesday.
“What did [Mitt Romney] say yesterday? … That judge Moore lacked honor and integrity and that’s why he couldn’t vote for him?” Bannon asked the audience in a packed Fairhope, Alabama barn who had come to support Judge Moore’s U.S. Senate bid.
Despite currently holding no elected office or position in the Republican Party, Romney jumped into the Alabama U.S. Senate race Monday to undermine Moore’s campaign, tweeting, “Roy Moore in the US Senate would be a stain on the GOP and on the nation. Leigh Corfman and other victims are courageous heroes. No vote, no majority is worth losing our honor, our integrity.”
The tweet incensed Bannon. “Judge Moore is a graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point,” he said. “Judge Moore served his country in one of the toughest wars we ever had, in Vietnam.”
The CBC thinks you and I are “far-right.” Why? Well, according to the state broadcasting, opposing illegal immigration, worrying about ISIS terrorism, and loving our country is all it takes to be far-right these days.
Over the Victoria Day long weekend, a group of protesters headed down to Roxham Road in Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle, Quebec, to protest illegal immigration and the Trudeau’s government’s handling of the border crisis.
In response, a group of far-left group of violent anarchists staged a counter-protest. The leftist mob was violent – against both police officers and a right-wing journalist who accidently went to the wrong protest.
But how did the CBC cover this? You guessed it, they maligned the group protesting against illegal border crossings, while celebrating the counter-protesters – even though the latter were violent.
One of the “far-right” protesters interviewed by the CBC was a construction worker from Ottawa. His grandpa fought in WWII and his great-grandfather in WWI. He said he was worried about ISIS, illegal criminals and the safety of his community. Does that sound “far-right?”
Meanwhile, the organizer of the leftist campaign is a known leader of Antifa – the masked thugs who believe in using violent and vandalism to advance their communist ideology. The man encouraged his followers on Facebook to vandalize Queen Victoria statues because it “represents a legacy of genocide, mass murder, torture, massacre, terror, forced famines, concentration camps, theft, cultural denigration, racism, and white supremacy.”
These far-left groups believe that borders and Canadian identity are “racist” and they call themselves “anti-racist.”
They believe our government and police agencies are “fascist” and they call themselves “anti-fascist.”
These people are not only delusional, they represent the very far left fringe of the political spectrum in Canada.
And yet, the CBC used the “far-right” slur against a patriot blue-collar worker, and the self-described “anti-racist” label to describe the violent thug.
The CBC sides with people who hate everything about Canada, our society, our history and our values. Imagine how far to the left this “unbiased CBC reporter” must be to consider anarchists mainstream and patriotic working-class men to be “far-right.” Your tax-dollars at work!
Last year, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau invited all self-professed “refugees” to his country via Twitter, effectively opening the borders without any vote or debate. Activist Faith Goldy visited the primary point of entry on the southern border of Quebec and upstate New York, and was spat upon and attacked by Antifa and other pro-immigration extremists. Police in riot gear stood down and just watched. She is afraid that the migrant crisis is overwhelming her country and dividing people to the point that it could lead to civil war.
Every day the crisis isn’t solved, the burden on services paid for by Canadians will keep getting worse.
Toronto Mayor John Tory says that despite frequent appeals for help dealing with a totally overwhelmed shelter system, “We just haven’t had any indication of any help at all. Zero.”
According to a report, ‘“I just don’t think that’s fair,” he said of a growing crisis that is expected to cost municipal taxpayers at least $64.5 million in 2017 and 2018.
Tory said the city has a “crisis on our hands” as college dorm rooms are transformed into shelter spaces and public buildings like community centres might be next.”
Over the past five months, President Trump’s ratings, according to the realclearpolitics.com moving average, have flipped from 38-58 to 44-52 — a growth of six points in approval and a drop of six points in disapproval.
It would be easy — and wrong — to dismiss this change as the mere fluctuation of polling or margin of error. No way. Considering the enormous polarization of opinion Trump has engendered — and the intensity with which those who disapprove hate him — it is remarkable that six percent have come over from a negative to a positive view of the man. They had a very long distance to travel.
But six percent have jumped the wide synapse and now like Donald Trump — a conclusion they would have found unthinkable five months ago. And the polls that break down approval and disapproval to indicate the depth of the sentiment — (i.e. strong approve, somewhat approve, somewhat disapprove, and strong disapprove) — report that most of the six percent have gone from strong disapproval to strong approval, bypassing the “somewhat” ratings in between. A great many have gone from hate all the way to love.
Could controversial pipeline be re-routed? Guest’s website: https://thebreaker.news/ Produced by https://www.HoweStreet.com Don’t miss out – Stay Informed! Receive the HoweStreet.com Weekly Recap with thought provoking podcasts, radio and articles delivered to your inbox. Sign up for the HoweStreet.com Weekly Recap on the homepage at https://www.HoweStreet.com
(Natural News) For the first time ever, the world’s most evil corporation may finally have to face up to their crimes in court. On June 18, 2018, one man will take Monsanto head-on, alleging that the company has been hiding the cancer-causing potential of Roundup for decades. Dewayne Johnson, a 48-year-old man from California is brave enough to fight cancer and Monsanto at the same time. Doctors say Johnson has just a few short months left to live, but his drive to make sure Monsanto pays for the toxin they’ve spread across the word is going to be hard to beat.
And now, his case against the biotech giant just got another helping hand; Judge Curtis Karnow issued an order last week that will allow jurors to not just consider evidence regarding what caused Johnson’s cancer — but also evidence that shows Monsanto’s been hiding the truth about glyphosate’s potential to cause harm.
“The internal correspondence noted by Johnson could support a jury finding that Monsanto has long been aware of the risk that its glyphosate-based herbicides are carcinogenic … but has continuously sought to influence the scientific literature to prevent its internal concerns from reaching the public sphere and to bolster its defenses in products liability actions. Thus there are triable issues of material fact,” Karnow reportedly stated.
The Guardian notes that some 4,000 plaintiffs have launched suits against the company similar to Johnson’s; they say that exposure to Roundup caused them (or their loved ones) to develop non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. In St. Louis, Missouri, another trial is scheduled to take place in October.
US President Donald Trump has cancelled his planned meeting with North Korean Dictator Kim Jong Un, after North Korea issued aggressive statements attacking US Vice President Mike Pence and threatening a “nuclear showdown.”
Trump has tweeted about the cancellation:
Sadly, I was forced to cancel the Summit Meeting in Singapore with Kim Jung Un. pic.twitter.com/qEoi9ymUEz
We greatly appreciate your time, patience, and effort with respect to our recent negotiations and discussions relative to a summit long sought by both parties, which was scheduled to take place on June 12 in Singapore. We were informed that the meeting was requested by North Korea, but that to us is totally irrelevant.
I was very much looking forward to being there with you. Sadly, based on the tremendous anger and open hostility displayed in your most recent statement, I feel it is inappropriate, at this time, to have this long-planned meeting. Therefore, please let this letter serve to represent that the Singapore summit, for the good of both parties, but to the detriment of the world, will not take place. You talk about your nuclear capabilities, but ours are so massive and powerful that I pray to God they will never have to be used.
I felt a wonderful dialogue was building up between you and me, and ultimately, it is only that dialogue that matters. Some day, I look very much forward to meeting you. In the meantime, I want to thank you for the release of the hostages who are now home with their families. That was a beautiful gesture and was very much appreciated.
If you change your mind having to do with this most important summit, please do not hesitate to call me or write.
The world, and North Korea in particular, has lost a great opportunity for lasting peace and great prosperity and wealth. This missed opportunity is a truly sad moment in history.”
While this is a disappointment, it makes sense from a negotiating perspective. North Korea had been counting on the US being so desperate for a deal that they would do anything to get it done and put up with any amount of disrespect. By walking away, and reminding North Korea that the US has a massive nuclear arsenal, Trump has shown that he won’t be pushed around, and that North Korea still has much to fear.
Since ruthless people like Kim Jong Un usually only respond to fear, it could bring him back to the table in time.
