Rocco Galati files Covid case against Bonnie Henry, John Horgan, Mike Farnsworth, Adrian Dix, and Others, including Trudeau/Tam

4

To View Filed Court Case Click HERE

 

PRESS RELEASE
Action4Canada and the Constitutional Rights Centre believe the government is infringing on human rights and have exceeded their authority causing irreparable harm. Their actions appear to constitute criminal negligence, breach of trust, incitement of hatred, crimes against humanity committed against our elderly, our children and society at large, by withholding life-saving treatments, causing extreme psychological trauma due to the ordering of isolation, lockdowns, masking, social distancing and, without making full, true and plain disclosure of the known risks thereof, mandating and promoting dangerous experimental medical injections which they know, or ought to know, cause adverse reactions and death.
The government’s dictatorial and unlawful measures and their out-of-control spending, in response to COVID-19 are further destroying our businesses, our communities, and our economy. Many small businesses have been forced to close. Furthermore, the escalating national debt is putting the future of our children and grandchildren at risk.
The measures are in violation of the Constitution and nearly every section of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Canadians have “guaranteed” rights. Such as Section 7 of the Charter and 1(a) of the Bill of Rights; “the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice”.
The government’s actions are putting our sovereignty, national security, and our democracy at risk .
On August 16th, 2021, Action4Canada formally filed legal action in the BC Supreme Court, which was issued by the court on August 17th and communicated to the plaintiffs on August 20th, by the court,  to hold multiple parties accountable for their actions with respect to COVID-19 measures. The defendants include: the Government of Canada, the Government of British Columbia, various public health officers, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, and others. Action4Canada is committed to defending faith, family and freedom.
To View Filed Court Case Click HERE

Left and Right-Leaning Canadians Both Distrust Trudeau On Racism, Immigration, by Brad Saltzberg

0

Is racism is being utilized as an instrument to divide society?

 

by Brad Saltzberg

September 17, 2021

Brad Graham is the vice-president of the Institute on Governance, an independent think-tank headquartered in Ottawa. In a recently released study, Mr. Graham outlines current public sentiment regarding Canada’s hot-button social issues– racism and immigration.

“All ideological cohorts have a negative trust sentiment regarding the ability of public institutions to improve systemic racism; stronger negative sentiment is present at both ends of the spectrum.”

It turns out that Canadians from all political spectrums dislike how Justin Trudeau and the Liberals handle these sensitive issues. No thinking citizen should be surprised. Based on careful observation, one could almost believe the state-of-affairs to be intentional.

“For issues related to immigration, the negative sentiment from the left and far left is based on a belief that government does not do enough to support new Canadians.”

CAP will not mince words: the left will never stop believing government does not do enough. Insatiability being integral to the agenda. Fifty years of mass immigration, including the highest per-capita intake quotas on earth, and nothing has ever been good enough.

Let’s take inventory on the matter. Over the past half-century, how many times has the Liberal left expressed appreciation for Canada’s “open-door” immigration policy? On how many occasions have refugee advocates displayed gratitude for all Canada has done to assist sufferers from the 3rd World?

The answer is never. Never satisfied, always wanting more, nothing is ever good enough. No wonder resentment builds on the so-called right.

“The far right, on the other hand, is negative on immigration and government because it believes that new Canadians get preferential treatment.”

A citizens does not have to be “far-right” to draw this conclusion. Pourquoi?  Because by way of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, it is a stone-cold reality.

Here’s a comment bound to increase inter-community harmony:

“I always laugh when you see people who are – not many of them, but – intolerant or who think, Go back to your own country,” Justin Trudeau said in the television interview.

“No!” Trudeau continued. “You chose this country. This is your country more than it is for othersbecause we take it for granted.”

Why on earth would a national leader dedicated to community harmony issue such as statement? The answer is obvious: because in reality, Trudeau has no interest in such a thing. Why not? Because social division is the key to national transformation.

READ MORE: Is Canada Being Walked Down A Path Toward A Dictatorship?

 

Marxism teaches that the potential for unity is dependant on battles and struggles against racism. Without a commitment by revolutionary organizations to the fight against racism, working-class unity will never be achieved and the revolutionary potential of the working class will never be realized.”

Translation: Racism, racial division, stoking of ethnic community disharmony is integral to communist revolution. Immigration exacerbates racist sentiment.

Institute for Governance: “In a world that is becoming increasingly polarized, there is temptation for governments to develop “wedge solutions” that play to the sentiments of one ideological cohort while ignoring those of another. In the long term, it will undermine trust in public institutions and democracy itself.”

What a thing of beauty this statement is. Witness the irony– the more ethnic communities assimilate into one another– a condition held sacrosanct by Canada’s Liberal government— the greater the degree of polarization.

What’s up with this social inversion? Does it not fit into our premise that immigration is increasing racist sentiment in Canada? Are we beginning to draw an unspoken conclusion?

Government are desirous of this condition. For what purpose? It is at this point we reference a comment Trudeau made early in the game: “Canada is a post-modern society.”

Only problem is, he never defined the statement, nor did Canadian media.

“In response to the contrasting sentiments regarding trust, the government could lead a national discussion on the importance of immigration to the future of Canada and the inclusion of new Canadians into society,” says the IFG.

But they never do. Not in an inclusive manner. Another paradox thus emerges: our Liberal government are fanatical about diversity of peoples, while maintaining zero interest in diversity of opinion.

Such as it is that there has never been a public forum inclusive of both sides of the spectrum. Institute on Governance speak of opinions of the left and right. They publish polls on the topic, thereby defining this in tangible terms.

But never– as in not once– has government or academia sponsored a forum on racism inclusive of those on the right. Rather, this breed of Canadian is shunned, ostracized, and branded racist, bigoted, xenophobic and homophobic.

What does all this tell us? CAP will go first: it tells our society that racism is being utilized as a political weapon. The end-goal comes back to our reference to authoritarian governance.

Simply stated, our days as a democratic society are numbered. The ruling Liberals are far more interested in communism. So much so, they are leveraging Marxist ideology to establish a neo-Canada.

Diversity is our strength? An absurd slogan to be sure. Diversity has led to Canada’s most fragmented social condition in the past century, and every bit of it is intentional.

— Brad Salzberg, CAP Founder(Est. 2021

Flashback: Hillary Clinton Was First to Promote Bogus Russian Alfa Bank Story – And Today Her Campaign Lawyer Got Indicted

0

by Cristina Laila

The Gateway Pundit

September 17, 2021

Most people who get involved with the Clintons either end up dead or indicted.

Hillary Clinton-linked Perkins Coie lawyer Michael Sussmann was indicted on Thursday for lying to the FBI about not representing “any client” when he acted as a running dog and tipped off the bureau about the Trump Organization secretly communicating with Russian Alfa Bank.

According to a debunked story published by far-left Slate, Trump set up a secret server at Trump Tower on 5th Avenue to “communicate privately with a Putin-tied Russian bank called Alfa Bank.”

The FBI began investigating the Trump Organization’s “back-channel” with the Russian-owned bank after Sussmann ran to the FBI and presented data files to back up the claims.

Read More HERE

The real “lab-leak” story: nanotech crimes and betrayals in the New World Order, by Jon Rappoport

0

“Scientists from the US and China are blowing each other kisses, as they collaborate on developing a technology that has the potential to gain intimate control over the human brain itself.”

by Jon Rappoport

No More Fake News

September 17, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

From lexico.com: nanotechnology: “The branch of technology that deals with dimensions and tolerances of less than 100 nanometers, especially the manipulation of individual atoms and molecules.”

PART ONE: NANOTECH FOR MIND CONTROL

Here are astonishing quotes from the journal Nano Today, in a 2019 paper titled: “Nanowire probes could drive high-resolution brain-machine interfaces.” Its authors are Chinese and American.

“…advances can enable investigations of dynamics in the brain [through nano-sensor-implants] and drive the development of new brain-machine interfaces with unprecedented resolution and precision.”

“…output electrical signals of brain activity or input electrical stimuli to modulate brain activity in concert with external machines, including computer processors and prosthetics, for human enhancement…”

This avenue of research involves “modulation” of the brain remotely connected to machines, for the purpose of control.

Modulation could include control of basic impulses, sensations, emotions.

Nano-sensors, implanted in the body and brain, would issue real time data-reports on body/brain functioning to ops centers.

And from those ops centers, data—including instructions—would be sent back to the nano-sensors, which would impose those instructions on the brain and body.

If this seems impossible, consider nanotech research aimed at improving the use of prosthetics. In that field, imposing instructions on the body/brain appears to be the whole point.

SUPPOSE, THROUGH VACCINES, NANOTECH IS INSERTED INTO BODIES AND BRAINS OF THE GLOBAL POPULATION? As a grand “experiment.”

PART TWO: WHO IS SHARING AND TRANSFERRING THIS NANOTECH RESEARCH?

Once upon a time, they called it espionage. Then they called it “illegal technology transfer.” Then they casually and admiringly called it Globalism.

In January of 2020, one of the leading nanoscience researchers in the world, Charles Lieber, was arrested and charged with concealing his research connections to China.

Bloomberg News, February 12, 2020: “…by targeting Lieber, the chairman of Harvard’s chemistry department and a veritable ivory tower blue blood, prosecutors struck at the crimson heart of the academic elite, raising fears that globalism, when it comes to doing science with China, is being criminalized.”

You mean some researchers believe sharing ultra-sensitive research with China should be standard operating procedure? Not just some researchers; many.

Bloomberg: “According to a government affidavit, signed by a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent named Robert Plumb, Lieber signed at least three agreements with Wuhan Technology University, or WUT, in central China. These included a contract with the state-sponsored Thousand Talents Plan—an effort by Beijing to attract mostly expatriate [Chinese] researchers and their know-how back home—worth a total of about $653,000 a year in pay [to Lieber] and living expenses for three years, plus $1.74 million [to Lieber] to support a new ‘Harvard-WUT Nano Key Lab’ in Wuhan. The government offered no evidence that Lieber actually received those sums… Lieber also deceived Harvard about his China contracts, the [federal] affidavit said.”

It gets worse. Far worse. Here’s the real money quote from the Bloomberg article: “Whatever extracurricular arrangements Lieber may have had in China, his Harvard lab was a paragon of U.S.-China collaboration. He relied on a pipeline of China’s brightest Ph.D. students and postdocs, often more than a dozen at a time, to produce prize-winning research on the revolutionary potential of so-called nanowires in biomedical implants. Dozens of Lieber’s 100 or so former lab members from China have chosen to stay in the U.S. Many now lead their own nanoscience labs at top universities, including Duke, Georgia Tech, MIT, Stanford, University of California at Berkeley, and UCLA.”

I’d say that’s a pretty big technology-transfer WOW right there. How many of those hundred Chinese nanotech researchers, who now occupy leading academic/research positions in the US, are actually scientific spies for Beijing?

A final note from Bloomberg: “In the 1990s and 2000s, as Lieber’s achievements and stature were taking off, U.S. research institutions and grant makers pumped money and moral support into expanding the burgeoning collaborations between scientists in the U.S. and other countries, particularly China. The new paradigm was globalization, China was an emerging economic power, and Lieber’s lab became an exemplar of pan-Pacific collaboration. “

Not a leak of technology transfer. A flood. Right out in the open.

How big a star is Charles Lieber? Thomson Reuters named him the number one chemist in the world (covering 2000-2010).

Lieber was operating a robust center at Harvard: Lieber Research Group. Its focus is nanoscience and nanotechnology. So it’s natural to ask, what kind of research findings would be shared with China?

On the Lieber Research Group’s website, there is this: “We are pioneering the interface between nanoelectronics and the life sciences…sensors for real-time disease detection…” These sensors would be placed inside the body.

The Chinese government has the clout, will, force, and intent to impose, without hesitation, every sort of possible control on its 1.4 billion citizens. It is in the process of building many new “smart cities.” These centers will be models of wall-to-wall surveillance. AI, Internet of Things, 5G, the works.

If nanoscience can achieve much more intimate access to people, through implanted sensors, the Chinese government will jump at the chance to deploy it. The cover story is obvious: WE MUST HAVE EARLY KNOWLEDGE OF NEW VIRUS EPIDEMICS. WE WILL DETECT THEM DIRECTLY FROM THE BODIES OF OUR PEOPLE IN REAL TIME.

The US and other countries are also eager to deploy nanotech in this way.

“Look, I’m certainly willing to share my latest research on nano-brain implants. But I need your, ahem, assurance that your government won’t use this for dark purposes.”

“I understand completely. My government would no more do that than your government would.”

“All right. Then we’re good.”

“Yes. Good.”

How did US-China relations get to this point? At one time, it appeared the two governments were involved in a cold war. Then President Nixon opened up China to trade, in 1972, after 25 years of no diplomatic relations. Nixon was the agent of David Rockefeller, who, several years earlier, had rescued him from a broken career as a politician. David Rockefeller, arch Globalist.

Here’s what Rockefeller blithely wrote in 1973, a year after Nixon had worked his China miracle:

“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” (“From a China Traveler”, nytimes.com, August 10, 1973)

Millions of people dead, freedom crushed, a whole population under the boot of the Communist regime, but somehow that’s not what David Rockefeller saw, or pretended to see. He, like other of his elite Globalist colleagues, admired the Chinese government for the capacity to control its own people, to such a high degree.

Flash forward 47 years. Scientists from the US and China are blowing each other kisses, as they collaborate on developing a technology that has the potential to gain intimate control over the human brain itself.

—Of course, remember, when political push comes to shove, and it always does, China is the friend of China. In the case of American corporate and government big shots, nationalism is dead.

This is what used to be euphemistically called “a trade imbalance.”


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealedclick here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALEDEXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

This entry was posted in Covid.

Newsom Wins California Recall Election, but 350,000 Ballots against Him Disappeared on Live TV!

1

 

September 17, 2021

California: On the night of the election to recall Governor Gavin Newsom, over 350,000 ballots tabulated in favor of removing him from office disappeared on a live CNN show. It is impossible to lose votes already counted in an honest election. The AP responded that this issue occurred due to a human error. There is video showing nine similar incidents that occurred during the 2020 Presidential election.

In addition to rolling back votes to remove Newsom, absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud. Police found 300 recall ballots and multiple California drivers licenses in a felon’s car. There is good reason to think, based on that, ballots have been stolen, election officials told Republican voters that they have already voted, indicating that another party used the Republicans’ ballots.

Read More HERE

Jordan Peterson interviews Maxime Bernier, Leader of the Peoples Party of Canada

0

This episode was recorded yesterday, September 16th, 2021. In this episode, Dr. Peterson is joined by the Honorable Maxime Bernier, leader of the People’s Party of Canada (PPC), former MP of Beauce (2006-2019) and candidate for the Prime ministership of Canada. Maxime shares his story, how and why he got into politics, the founding of the PPC and his vision for the future of Canada. There is also discussion on “common sense” policies, free markets, governmental overreach, the dismantling of classical conservative ideals, and the upcoming Canadian election (20th September 2021). People’s Party of Canada: https://www.peoplespartyofcanada.ca/

 

 

A True Canadian Patriot who supports the Peoples Party of Canada

1

Canadians are uniting over the right to choose , as every political party has stated they will enforce mandatory vaccines , except for 1 party , the People’s Party of Canada
it’s your choice

 

 

Burnaby 2021 federal election candidate Q&A: People’s Party of Canada Brad Nickerson

0
Burnaby North-Seymour People’s Party of Canada candidate Brad Nickerson. 

General voting day is Monday, Sept. 20

By: Jess Balzer

Burnabynow

September 17, 2021

With Canadians heading to the polls on Sept. 20, 2021, the NOW has sent Q&As to each candidate listed in Burnaby South and Burnaby North-Seymour.

The same Q&A has been sent to each candidate and answers have not been changed or altered.

BURNABY NORTH-SEYMOUR – BRAD NICKERSON – PEOPLE’S PARTY OF CANADA

Question: What are your thoughts on the TMX pipeline project? Should it go ahead? Why or why not?

Answer: I have been living near the base of Burnaby Mountain since the early 1980’s and have been hiking its trails ever since. You cannot go three feet without stepping over a pipeline buried somewhere. Locals have been living with pipelines uneventfully, except for one occasion in recent memory when an excavating company needed a better map, for many decades. The plan for a vast Increase in tanker traffic in our waters once the TMX pipeline project is completed, however, is an entirely different matter.

But there is also a solution to the very real threat posed by the environmental risk of a massive increase in tanker traffic now that the TMX is a fait accompli.

In July of 2019 Prime Minister Trudeau was asked about soaring fuel costs and the ongoing debate over the new Trans Mountain pipeline (TMX), and whether building new refineries might be a good idea? Mr. Trudeau responded at the time by saying that he was open to proposals from the private sector for a new refinery in British Columbia.

Increasing our refining capacity in the lower mainland was a good idea then and it’s a good idea now, if only to help reduce the risk that we do not have a major tanker spill in our waters that would result in untold environmental damage. The good paying jobs it would bring, and the sense of security from having more sovereign control over our domestic fuel supply would certainly be a bonus.

Building the Green New Deal is going to take a lot of oil – or did you think wind farms and solar energy installations built themselves? That being the case, Canada needs to stop selling its oil to foreign refiners at a discount, who then can turn around and charge us whatever we will bear, when they sell it back to us as ‘value-added’ fuels.

Read More HERE

Breaking: OR Senators Filed Grand Jury Petition into CDC’s Willful Misconduct to Hyperinflate COVID-19 Data

0

Stand For Health Freedom

September 17, 2021

Oregon Senators File Formal Grand Jury Petition Calling for Investigation into CDC’s Willful Misconduct to Hyperinflate COVID-19 Data Following Federal Law Violations

The formal request for a Grand Jury Investigation was brought forth on behalf of more than 62,200 Americans who signed a public petition gathered by Stand for Health Freedom.

Breaking—Oregon State Senators Kim Thatcher and Dennis Linthicum jointly filed a formal petition for a federal grand jury investigation into both the CDC and FDA on August 16th in the city of Medford, Oregon, Jackson County. The official letter included eight exhibits and 20 references for evidentiary materials showing a clear need to formally investigate the agencies for willful misconduct.

Read More HERE

 

 

Whistle Blower Funeral Director John O’Looney Has Now Has Been SUSUPENDED!

4

Now I know why this vid was labelled ‘A Must Watch’. This funeral director knows what is going on, and what is to come and it ain’t nice, but deadly…  Jesus, Come Quickly!

Milton Keynes Family Funeral Services
https://www.mkffs.co.uk/
John O’Looney’s direct email:
[email protected]

John Olooney
@OlooneyJohn

So today I have been suspended from the S.A.I F. – for honesty. This typifies what this country has become.

Image

 

 

John Durham Grand Jury Indicts Lawyer Whose Firm Represented Democrats in 2016

0
FILE - In this April 25, 2006 file photo, U.S. Attorney John Durham speaks to reporters on the steps of U.S. District Court in New Haven, Conn. Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith will plead guilty to making a false statement in the first criminal case arising from U.S. Attorney John Durham's investigation into the probe of ties between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign. (AP Photo/Bob Child, File)
U.S. Attorney John Durham speaks to reporters on the steps of U.S. District Court in New Haven, Conn., on April 25, 2006. (Bob Child/AP Photo)

 

by Jack Phillips

The Epoch Times

September 16, 2021

Special prosecutor John Durham has charged Washington-based lawyer Michael Sussmann, who represented former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee, with lying to the FBI during Clinton’s 2016 campaign.

Sussmann works for the high-powered law firm Perkins Coie—which has long done legal work for the Democratic Party and top Democrats, including filing election-related lawsuits.

The lawyer was indicted (pdf) on a single felony count of making a false statement during a meeting with FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016. Prosecutors allege that Sussmann lied by denying he represented any client when he told the federal law enforcement agency about evidence that allegedly linked then-candidate Donald Trump’s Trump Tower to a bank in Russia.

Read More HERE

 

 

RedPill Living
RedPill Living
RedPill Living