Why does Justin Trudeau refrain from condemning the nation whose emissions exceed those of all other countries combined?
November 3, 2021
According to Fortune Magazine, China continues to burn more coal than any other developed nation, despite its pledge to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2060.
As reported by Scientific American, China’s carbon emissions are the highest in the world. Their 2019 emission levels exceed those of all developed countries combined to reach 14 gigatons of carbon dioxide equivalent. That’s approximately 27% of the global total.
After the recent COP26 environmental summit in Europe, Cultural Action Party has reached a conclusion we suspect few will deny. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has positioned himself as an ersatz saviour of global carbon emissions.
CAP can understand why. The man is desperate to establish a positive legacy for himself. Perhaps even he too has come to a logical conclusion: Canadians with common sense loathe him. Therefore, he must reach out to the world stage to conjure up some form of positivity surrounding his so-called “legacy.”
Throughout the process, it should be noted that a curious omission remains: the Trudeau family’s beloved nation of China. Canadian patriots, please do tell:
Read More HERE
The Justin Trudeau Legacy = all of his crimes, the most crime ridden “PM” in history. The absolute worst PM ever, even worse then Pierre.
One can wish for a carbon neutral world which itself is totally stupid (BTW the dupes and liars call CO2 a pollutant which it is not) but that said one can wish for a carbon neutral world. It’s impossible for it to happen any time soon if ever, certainly not by 2050.
Notice how these magical dates are so far ahead, 2030, 2035, 2050 etc. It’s all a scam to pilfer productive industries and nations (notably the retarded western world ones) to support lunacies and fallacies, all the while politicians and hacks, like parasites take their cut of the money.
There is no way to replace fossil fuels globally anytime soon if ever. To say so can happen is a lie. Ask those who claim it can be done to explain where we will get the energy short of fossil fuels to replace them by and how will it all be built and maintained by 2050? YOU WILL NOT GET ANY QUANTIFIABLE ANSWERS!!!
Just one solid example of a non fossil fuel energy source, NUCLEAR POWER, which has the ability of directly replacing fossil fuel electricity generating plants. The world today would have to build and bring online 1, 1.5 gigawatt nuclear power plant each day from now until Jan. 2050 if we want to replace fossil fuel electrically generated plants with nuclear plants. NOT FRIGGING POSSIBLE EVEN IF WE TRIED!!! AND I EVEN SUPPORT USING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN FUTURE!
I won’t bother bringing up the nonsense of wind turbines and solar panels as these are more laughable to replace fossil fuel generated electric plants. But I will add only this, that each 150 foot long wind turbine blade uses approximately 60,000 lbs. of epoxy and 100,000 lbs. of fibreglass. Each wind turbine base averages the need for 800 tons of concrete plus steel rebar. The carbon foot print of these is off the charts!
BTW at 420 ppm CO2 today is well below the average CO2 the Earth has seen over the millions of years. In fact the Earth has averaged over its history CO2 between 1000-1500 ppm. ALL LONG BEFORE INDUSTRIALIZED MANKIND!